ACCC v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 522: Former Company Director Found Guilty of Contempt of Court
Tuesday 30 May 2017 @ 9.50 a.m. | Legal Research | Trade & Commerce
In the recent judgment of ACCC v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 522 (17 May 2017), the Federal Court has sentenced a former company director of a parcel distribution business for “Heartlink” branded products, Laurence Hann, to five months imprisonment for failing to comply with court orders made against him in May 2012, following the latest action from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (the ACCC) for contempt of Court.
Background to the Judgment
In May 2012, the Federal Court found that Mr Hann had engaged in false, misleading or deceptive conduct, and been knowingly concerned in the conduct of three corporations that breached the Trade Practices Act 1974 (now the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)). The Court found that, as a result of the conduct, consumers were misled about the profitability and earnings potential of the parcel distribution business opportunity as well as the overall viability of the business.
The ACCC filed proceedings for contempt on 14 December 2015 alleging that Mr Hann had breached these injunctions by being involved in a business selling household cleaning products, claiming that some of the money from the sale of those goods would be donated to charity and recruiting a person to sell and distribute products in connection with that business.
On 7 October 2016, Justice Tracey made orders by consent that Mr Hann was guilty of each contempt charge brought by the ACCC.
The Current Penalties
The Court imposed orders disqualifying Mr Hann from managing a corporation for 15 years, as well as injunctions preventing him for a period of 15 years from carrying on a business or supplying goods or services in connection with which:
- persons are invited to invest money or perform work;
- any claim is made that moneys or profits earned by the sale of goods are donated to charity; or
- goods or services concerned are or include household cleaning products.
Tracey J found Mr Hann in contempt of court and ordered him to serve two weeks of the five-month sentence with the remainder suspended. The court also ordered Mr Hann to pay the ACCC’s full costs.
His Honour said at [para 175], in relation to costs that:
Comment from the Sentencing Judge
In handing down his judgment, Tracey J stated at [para 25]:
His Honour also noted at [paras 169-170]:
His Honour also restrained Ms Vicki Ann Lowe from engaging in the promotion of business activities or opportunities where representations are made as to the potential earnings of that business activity, where there are no reasonable grounds for such representations. This injunction was ordered by consent following the filing of a Statement of Agreed Facts in relation to the ACCC's case against Ms Lowe.
TimeBase is an independent, privately owned Australian legal publisher specialising in the online delivery of accurate, comprehensive and innovative legislation research tools including LawOne and unique Point-in-Time Products. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice and does not substitute for the advice of competent legal counsel.
Sources:
ACCC v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 522 (17 May 2017)
Heartlink company director banned for 15 years and penalised $450,000 – findlaw.com.au
ACCC contempt action results in jail sentence for director – ACCC Release MR 72/17