ACT Affirms Commitment to OPCAT

Monday 19 February 2018 @ 10.02 a.m. | Crime | Legal Research

Last Thursday, 15 February 2018, the Australian Capital Territory’s Legislative Assembly passed the Monitoring of Places of Detention (Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture) Bill 2017 (ACT) (the “Bill”). Now awaiting notification, this Bill affirms the ACT’s commitment to its obligations under the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT), ratified by the Australian Government in December 2017.

In the media release of the Australian Human Rights Commission dated 15 December 2017, Human Rights Commissioner Edward Santow highlighted the significance of the OPCAT ratification:

“We commend the Attorney-General and Australian Government on this crucial milestone. This is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to protect vulnerable people in detention. And so we must get this right.

Places of detention are often hidden. This can make it more likely that abuse will take place – as we saw in the Don Dale Youth Detention Centre, […]

OPCAT offers something new. It doesn’t wait for abuse to take place. Instead, it adopts a preventive approach, shining a light on problems before they deteriorate further. It also highlights good practices that other detention facilities can learn from.”

For further information on the Australian Government’s intention to ratify OPCAT, see the TimeBase article here.

OPCAT

OPCAT was adopted in 2002 by the United Nations (UN). The aim of OPCAT, in article 1, is to:

“establish a system of regular visits undertaken by independent international and national bodies to places where people are deprived of their liberty in order to prevent torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”

The requirements designated to State parties by OPCAT include two levels of monitoring oversight of places of detention. The first is the creation of a national preventative mechanism (NPM) whereby (article 3) “each State Party shall set up, designate or maintain at the domestic level one or several visiting bodies for the prevention of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment”. The second level of oversight is the formulation of the Subcommittee on Prevention (article 2). The culmination of these two mechanisms is outlined in Article 4:

“1. Each State Party shall allow visits, in accordance with the present Protocol, by the mechanisms referred to in articles 2 and 3 to any place under its jurisdiction and control where persons are or may be deprived of their liberty, either by virtue of an order given by a public authority or at its instigation or with its consent or acquiescence (hereinafter referred to as places of detention). These visits shall be undertaken with a view to strengthening, if necessary, the protection of these persons against torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

2. For the purposes of the present Protocol, deprivation of liberty means any form of detention or imprisonment or the placement of a person in a public or private custodial setting which that person is not permitted to leave at will by order of any judicial, administrative or other authority.”

The ACT Bill

In the second reading speech, Mr Rattenbury (Kurrajong—Minister for Climate Change and Sustainability, Minister for Justice, Consumer Affairs and Road Safety, Minister for Corrections and Minister for Mental Health) outlined the ACT’s obligations upon ratification of OPCAT in Australia:

“OPCAT, as it is known, establishes a monitoring system to ensure that all governments are observing their obligations under the United Nations convention against torture and are taking effective legislative, administrative and judicial measures to prevent acts of torture in their territories.

In pursuit of this objective, OPCAT mandates regular visits by both independent international and domestic bodies to places where people are deprived of their liberty. In the ACT, these places include the Alexander Maconochie Centre, juvenile detention, secure psychiatric units, court cells and prison transport. The purpose of the visits is to make recommendations that strengthen safeguards against torture or other mistreatment in detention environments.

OPCAT recognises that the prohibition on torture and other mistreatment is a fundamental right that must not be limited. This is especially true in places where people are involuntarily deprived of their liberty and so may be more vulnerable to abuse. Once it is ratified, OPCAT will immediately require the ACT to grant the UN Subcommittee on the Prevention of Torture unrestricted access to any place of detention in the territory and any relevant information the subcommittee requests to fulfil its mandate.”

The Bill as passed therefore creates the framework to allow for subcommittee visits to places of detention within the ACT. As outlined in the explanatory memorandum, it does this by:

  • defining ‘places of detention’ for the purpose of subcommittee visits;
  • setting out the relationship between the Bill and other laws in the Territory;
  • providing for arrangements for subcommittee visits, including establishment of Ministerial arrangements for the purpose of facilitating subcommittee visits;
  • setting out the duties of detaining authorities and the responsible Minister;
  • providing for the subcommittee to access places of detention, access information and interview detainees and other people; and
  • protecting against action for giving information and against reprisal for disclosing information.

TimeBase is an independent, privately owned Australian legal publisher specialising in the online delivery of accurate, comprehensive and innovative legislation research tools including LawOne and unique Point-in-Time Products. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice and does not substitute for the advice of competent legal counsel.

Sources:

Related Articles: