Tasmania Introduces Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Amendment Bill 2019
Thursday 21 November 2019 @ 11.26 a.m. | Corporate & Regulatory | Legal Research
On 14 November 2019 the Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Amendment Bill 2019 (Tas) (“the Bill”) was introduced into Tasmania’s House of Assembly (“Assembly”) by Minister for Primary Industries and Water, the Hon Guy Barnett.
The Bill proposes amendments to the Workplaces (Protection From Protesters) Act 2014 (“the Act”), with the object of the amendments to “ensure protection for lawful business activity in Tasmania”.
Background
As outlined in the Bill’s Explanatory Memorandum (“EM”), the proposed outcome is to be achieved by:
- moving the focus of the Act away from protesters;
- repealing a number of existing offences contained in the Act;
- adding new offences to the Act relating to trespassing on business premises and in or on business vehicles, obstructing public thoroughfares, and threatening to commit an offence to impede the carrying out of a business activity; and
- providing police officers with clearer powers of arrest.
Outline of the Proposed Amendments
Some of the substantive amendments to the Act include:
- amending section 1 “Short title”;
- amending section 3 “Interpretation”;
- amending section 5 “Meaning of business premises”; and
- substituting sections 6, 7 and 8.
Proposed penalties outlined in section 6(4)(b)(i) and (ii) provide for a first offence of “a fine not exceeding 60 penalty units or a term of imprisonment not exceeding 18 months, or both; or”, while a further offence could attract “a fine not exceeding 60 penalty units or imprisonment for a term not exceeding 4 years, or both”.
Minister’s Comment on the Bill
Commenting on the Bill in a Media Release, the Minister said:
In the Minister’s Speech to Parliament, he said:
The Case of Brown v Tasmania
In January 2016, environmentalist and former Senator Bob Brown was arrested for being on a public road in Tasmania's north-west while he was trying to take video footage of loggers.
The legislation allowed police to stop protests before they had started if they were on a business premises or an access area, and allowed on-the-spot fines for protesters as well as gaol time for second offences.
The charge against Mr Brown was eventually dropped, but he argued the laws violated the “implied freedom of political communication”. He challenged the laws, and in 2017 the High Court of Australia found they were at “odds with the implied right to freedom of political communication”, with their Honours noting at [paras 152-153] of the judgment (Brown v Tasmania [2017] HCA 43 (18 October 2017)):
Industry Comment and Reaction to the Bill
In a recent Media Release, CEO of the Australian Forest Products Association (“AFPA”) Ross Hampton, welcomed the introduction of the Bill, commenting that:
It is reported the Tasmanian Government is confident the proposed changes are constitutional, but some legal stakeholders are highly critical of the proposed legislation.
Speaking to ABC News, University of Tasmania Senior Law Lecturer Brendan Gogarty said the legislation “amounted to a bill of rights for companies with no equivalent for citizens”. Mr Gogarty commented:
TimeBase is an independent, privately owned Australian legal publisher specialising in the online delivery of accurate, comprehensive and innovative legislation research tools including LawOne and unique Point-in-Time Products. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice and does not substitute for the advice of competent legal counsel.
Sources:
Workplaces (Protection from Protesters) Amendment Bill 2019 (Tas) - Bill and supporting information available from TimeBase LawOne Service.
AFPA Welcomes Tas Government Commitment To Protecting Workplaces – AFPA (14 November 2019)