ACCC Commences Federal Court Action Against Thermomix
Tuesday 20 June 2017 @ 10.37 a.m. | Legal Research | Trade & Commerce
The ACCC has revealed in a recent ACCC Media Release that it has commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against Thermomix In Australia Pty Ltd (Thermomix), alleging it contravened several provisions of the Australian Consumer Law (the ACL) - contained in Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) - in relation to its Thermomix appliances.
Background to the Action
Thermomix supplied the TM31 model in Australia up until September 2014. The current model, the TM5, has been supplied in Australia since September 2014.
A voluntary recall notice in relation to a safety issue with the TM31 was published on the ACCC’s Product Safety website on 7 October 2014 (PRA 2014/14361, following notification by Vorwerk Elektowerke GmbH & Co. KG (Vorwerk is the manufacturer of the Thermomix appliances). The recall facilitated the replacement of the original grey lid sealing ring with a new green sealing for all affected TM31s.
Separate to the recall action, Thermomix and Vorwerk advise that TM31 customers should replace their sealing rings every two years. Consumers should contact Thermomix if they require a new sealing ring.
Thermomix first notified its customers of the recall safety issue by way of a Facebook post on 23 September 2014, and subsequently sent emails to affected TM31 customers notifying them of the safety issue on 25 September 2014. Approximately 105,000 of the potentially affected TM31 appliances were supplied to Thermomix for sale to Australian customers.
The Allegations
The ACCC alleges that Thermomix misled customers about their consumer guarantee rights, failed to comply with mandatory reporting requirements for injuries arising from the use of the appliances, made false representations and engaged in misleading conduct regarding the safety of the TM31 model, and made false and misleading statements about its 2014 recall.
In relation to consumer guarantee rights, the ACCC alleges that Thermomix represented to certain consumers that the ACL remedies to which they were entitled could only be obtained by signing agreements with non-disclosure terms and other terms that prevented them from making disparaging comments about Thermomix. The ACCC also alleges that Thermomix represented to other consumers that it would not provide refunds or replacements as a remedy at any time.
In relation to the mandatory reporting requirements, the ACCC alleges that Thermomix failed to notify the Commonwealth Minister within two days of becoming aware that a person had suffered a serious injury associated with the use, or foreseeable misuse, of a Thermomix appliance. The ACCC alleges that this occurred in 14 instances because Thermomix failed to give notice of these serious injury incidents within the mandatory two-day notification period.
Reaction and Comment from the ACCC
The ACCC Acting Chair Delia Rickard said:
In relation to the safety of the TM31 model, it is alleged that Thermomix made false representations and engaged in misleading conduct by representing to consumers that it was not aware of any safety issue with the TM31 by continuing to supply the TM31 when it was aware of a safety issue that ultimately led to a recall action in October 2014, and failing to disclose that safety issue to consumers as soon as it became aware of it.
Statement from Thermomix
Thermomix in Australia said in a statement, that it had been aware of the ACCC investigation for some time. The statement said:
TimeBase is an independent, privately owned Australian legal publisher specialising in the online delivery of accurate, comprehensive and innovative legislation research tools including LawOne and unique Point-in-Time Products. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal advice and does not substitute for the advice of competent legal counsel.
Sources:
Thermomix faces Federal Court action by Australian Competition and Consumer Commission – news.com.au
ACCC takes action against Thermomix – ACCC Release MR 89/17